Pages

Showing posts with label Pope Benedict XVI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pope Benedict XVI. Show all posts

Monday, 17 September 2012

Syria: Michel Kilo’s public appeal to the Pope


Add caption
Your Holiness, reach out   بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ
Michel Kilo, the Syrian Christian thinker, writer and human rights activist, penned this appeal to Pope Benedict XVI on the occasion of his three-day visit to Lebanon. The appeal, which I rephrased in English, appeared yesterday in Arabic on all4syria.info:

Your Holiness, I wish to address you in the name of God, who Muslims call “the Gracious, the Merciful.”
I am not, Your Holiness, a believer in all what religions put forward. But I believe they preserved the human race by sanctifying human life, which is imprinted with the very image of its Creator.
In my view, the obligation to preserve human life is the greatest of the Divine messages.
Without it, we wouldn’t have witnessed today’s humankind, or lived its inventiveness and achievements. We wouldn’t have formed entities replete with flaws and shortcomings.
Without it too, individuals wouldn’t have sanctified the life granted them by their Creator, who tolerates their thoughtlessness and numerous mistakes because He is “Gracious, Merciful.”
I am, Your Holiness, Syrian, Arab and Christian. I am a citizen in a region that managed, throughout its long and tortuous history, to fuse its human, religious, cultural and political components.
True, the region was not all too familiar with the concept of tolerance. But is still upheld and breathed tolerance hundreds of years before John Locke published his book “A Letter Concerning Toleration.”
I have no doubt in my mind Your Holiness is aware of and thankful that this region coined most terms that founded human civilization. I am referring to terms like religion, abstract thought, numbers, agriculture, domestication of animals, metals melting, statehood, ways to control nature, writing, music, painting and dance…
Your Holiness is also aware that the message of Islam -- the region’s last religion -- recognizes and reveres its two preceding monotheistic faiths, Judaism and Christianity.
Suffice to read Your Holiness what the Quran says of Jesus (Issa) --“And we gave Issa, the son of Mary, clear arguments and strengthened him with the Holy Spirit” [Chapter Two, Verse 87] – or Mary -- “And when the Angels said: O Mary! Allah hath chosen thee, and made thee pure, and hath preferred thee above (all) the women of creation.” [Chapter Three, Verse 42].
Your Holiness would surely note the difference between these wordings and all that was penned about Jesus and Mary over time.
Your Holiness, as soon as you mention Jesus, a Muslim would immediately and piously say “Issa, peace be upon him.” If you mentioned his mother’s name, the Muslim would solemnly refer to “Maryam, peace be upon her.”
Lastly, Your Holiness is aware that Christianity survived in this Levant, its cradle for over 2000 years. It did so alongside other religions and spiritual persuasions, the most important of which is Islam. And Islam is imbued with some things Christian.
Muslims are akin to Christians in some aspects of their tolerant religion. Otherwise, they would not have respected our presence in their midst, even though their religion prescribes Da’wa or Islamic missionary activity.
But they always believe in God’s mercy, which commits them to be merciful towards God’s creation.
True, this has not always been the case. Equally true, this has mostly been the case in the largest part of history.
Otherwise, how would one explain the continued presence of Christianity in the Levant after the Crusades, which the Muslims called the wars of the Franks simply to avoid defaming the Cross?
And who protected Christianity and Christians after the Franks were routed by Muslim armies that co-opted Christian fighters?
I tell Your Holiness in all frankness that the mutual sense of belonging is what protected both sides.
Didn’t Syrian cities’ Christian welcome with open arms their cousin Muslim forces as they strove to engage the Byzantine Church’s Crusaders? And didn’t a Christian fighting in the Muslim army exclaim during the Battle of al-Qadisiyyah: “I swear by al-Kaaba that I have slain Rustam.”
The Christian fighter was referring to the powerful commander of the large Persian force confronting the Muslim army.
Today, innumerable attempts are being made to sever this historic partnership.
The attempts are mounted by an assortment of Christian and Muslim sides as well as by hardliners and fanatic institutions and organizations that have espoused confessional views.
On the Muslim side, such views are formulated in the most retarded and intransigent parts of the Islamic world. They don’t challenge Christianity only, but primarily nonradical Islam.
In the Christian corner, there are extremist Churches that perceive the Muslim as an enemy with whom they have been forced to live. They don’t see him as a partner or kindred who shares the belief in God and His mercy.
There are clergymen who consider themselves combatants engaged in a belated battle that should have been settled a long time ago. Today, these churchmen are the chief stokers of the fire engulfing the two sides’ believers. The fire they are stoking is no different than the fire stoked by foolhardy Muslims.
The problem is that these clerics are turning their back on Your Holiness, perhaps without you knowing. They are waging their battle under banners they claim are your own. They say you share their views and you are part of a world hostile to Arabs and Muslims. They advocate a ravaging confessional war that has had no place in our Levantine history. They wish for an armed conflict to mirror the inter-Christian wars that once broke out in Europe. They see themselves as fighting on Europe’s side and on the side of Your Holiness and what you represent.
You have, Your Holiness, to restrain them and put them in their place with unequivocal language.
You have to bring them back to their senses, reminding them there is no, -- and will not be -- a Christian-Muslim war.
They have to be told that Christianity does not back any war on anyone, especially not the war the Syrian regime is waging on its people in the name of fighting terrorists. It is an open secret that the regime has always embraced, nurtured and trained terrorists before making common cause with them inside Syria and elsewhere on Arab and Muslim territory.
The Quran orders: “And slay not the life which Allah hath forbidden” [Chapter 17, Verse 33].
The Syrian regime’s warplanes are not killing the enemies of Jesus Christ. They are bombing peaceful cities and villages without possibly distinguishing between a terrorist and a child or woman or elderly or youth. This means hundreds of unarmed and innocent civilians are probably killed for every insurgent who took up arms in self-defense against the regime’s oppression and blind violence.
The Syrian regime is not fighting a battle in defense of Christianity to earn the sympathy of Christian Churches and clerics. It is fighting to defend its tyranny, benefits and oppressive and abusive policies while claiming to be secular.
In fact, the regime’s only religion is a cult of personality.
The regime is not fighting a battle to defend Christians either. Christians are under no risk except from the foolishness of some of its Churches and clerics. Such foolishness got them to the stage of blessing and celebrating the killing of children, women and elderly people in the false belief that they are party to a salvation war against terrorism and extremism. They don’t see regime violence as being either terrorist or extremist. It’s also as though a genocidal regime’s victory justifies sacrificing the life of a single human being.
How could such Churches claim to be faithful to Jesus of Nazareth, the greatest opponent of violence in human history?
Return the Church to its senses, Your Holiness.
Remind the Church that what kept Christianity in the Levant after the Franks’ wars was the stand Christians took in support of justice. Together with their Muslim cousins, Levantine Christians faced up to submission. They cannot today tolerate regimes that are incapable of ruling people seeking freedom and democracy without using artillery, tanks and warplanes to suppress them.
The Levant’s Christianity is in great danger, Your Holiness, not because it is threatened by Muslim fundamentalism, but because it is manipulated by Christian fundamentalists and a mentality adopted and practiced by some Christian churchmen. Their inhuman and immoral policies and stances are a betrayal of Jesus of Nazareth.
The visit of Your Holiness could mark a turning point in the history of Christianity and Islam. Don’t participate or approve of the temples’ demolition over the heads of Arab Christians. Stretch out your blessed hand to spare Arab Christians the follies of their Churches and clerics.

Monday, 10 September 2012

Pope’s eyes in Lebanon will be on its surroundings

The late Pope with Lebanese Muslim leaders (L). His successor (R) lands in Beirut Friday

Talal Salman, founding publisher and editor-in-chief of the Lebanese daily as-Safir, penned today’s front-page leader in Arabic:
When he arrives Friday, Pope Benedict XVI will not find the same Lebanon his predecessor, the late Pope John Paul II, visited in May 1997.
Firstly, conditions have changed in the small country.
At the same time, the situation is drastically different in its immediate neighborhood and the surroundings, where dramatic changes herald open-ended civil wars under fake religious and sectarian slogans.
That’s probably why the new papal visit is Lebanese by name only. Its focus though is the complete gamut of the “New Middle East” – the hope being to comprehensively reflect on explosive regional issues.
Do we need to recall (1) that the Vatican has the world’s largest information gathering and analysis network (2) that it has specialized departments that are not only concerned with religious matters but monitor political, economic and social transformations and their implications, and (3) that it has its niche in the realm of international decision-making?
For the Pope to come to Lebanon at this particular point in time -- when the pan-Arab nation is swept by popular uprisings and protest movements against its regimes, with great implications for the countries concerned and the region generally – means the visit’s objectives certainly transcend the “Lebanese case.”
The visit’s objectives encompass the course of events in Lebanon’s surroundings and their fallouts on the Lebanese -- this, plus a reassurance message to Lebanon that it is not forgotten or left to twist in the wind or fall into the abyss, considering its leaderships’ failings.
It is easy to say that by flying to Lebanon Pope Benedict XVI wants to reassure all Christians in the Orient that they are not overlooked, that their wellbeing is the concern of both the Vatican and eastern and western powers, and that such concern takes in the mutations, regime changes and changed circumstances across the region that sometimes go beyond the slogans raised in revolution squares.
It’s worth pondering the longer-term objectives of the impending (September 14-16) visit, which is exceptional by its timing and avowed purpose.
(Arriving in Beirut in the early afternoon on Friday, Pope Benedict XVI will go to the basilica of St. Paul in Harissa, where he will sign the apostolic exhortation. The papal document will summarize and reflect upon the discussions held by the Synod of Bishops in October 2010. That special meeting of the Synod was dedicated to the challenges facing the Church in the Middle East).
“Lebanon is more than a country, Lebanon is a message of freedom and an example of pluralism for both the East and the West…” were the words of the late Pope John Paul II during his May 1997 visit.
The country was then largely united after a political settlement of the Lebanon civil war -- and the wars of others on its soil. That war, or multiple wars, consumed all manner of religious, confessional and sectarian jingles before settling on the catchphrase of power-sharing with guarantees from Arab, read chiefly Syria with some Saudi input, and international, read chiefly American with some European and Vatican effort, players.
But the Arab region today is unlike what it used to be 15 years ago. Circumstances have changed almost everywhere since 1997.
Syria, the guarantor of the 1989 Taef Agreement ending the Lebanon civil war was strong, its people united and its regime a regional heavyweight. West and East, Arabs, Iranians and Turks recognized Syria’s pivotal role in ending the Lebanon civil war.
Syria today is in Lebanon’s former decade-long civil war situation. All its sides are crumbling, including its ancient cities and its capital, which was the world’s capital one day, as a consequence of bloody clashes, mass-killing bombings and the disastrous flight en bloc of its citizens in all directions – whether to Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon or Iraq.
The army was thrown into the fray with all weapons at its disposal, including warplanes. This led to a situation of open combat between the regime and a separate mix of opposition forces -- some of them nationalist insurgents seeking reform to protect the country and other Salafist, jihadist and anarchist groups fighting for their own purposes or plundering the country’s antiquities.
In short, the country that was a model of immunity by virtue of its national unity risks putting its destiny – as Lebanon did before – in the hands of external forces.
It is consequently understandable to revisit, on the sidelines of the deadly conflict, the subject of the “fate of Christian minorities” in the region – especially after the plight and sufferings at the hands of shadowy gangs of Iraq’s Christians, who were displaced and dispersed throughout the world.
The Vatican had to help descendants of Christians who inhabited Iraq since the dawn of history relocate to Europe and the United States.
Here we are then facing the prospects of an organized drive to protect Syria’s Christians, taking into consideration also the mass emigration of Lebanese Christians in the wake of internecine strife in their homeland.
Hence the need to give thought to the past, present and future of the Christians of Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, let alone the Holy Land…